June 2026 - Trend Spotting - The Future of DEI
Jun 24, 2026
|
Trends We're Watching |
|
June 2026 FutureGood is a consultancy focused on helping visionary leaders build a better future. Through strategic visioning, keynotes, retreats, and online learning, FutureGood helps thought leaders (like you!) to deploy futurism. |
|
We are watching so many interesting trends each month that we've decided to share them with our community. If you want us to look out for a specific subject, reach out and let us know! |
|
|
The Future of DEI |
|
|
Nonprofits are shifting their DEI focus from hiring toward keeping the people they already have. Organizations are investing in psychological safety, flexible work, and wellness supports as retention tools, and increasingly treating these as equity issues, not perks. |
|
What this could mean for the social sector: Recruitment pipelines mean little if the workplace drives people out. Social sector organizations that treat belonging and burnout prevention as operational priorities, not HR programs, will hold onto experienced staff longer and spend less on the cycle of hiring and retraining. The deeper shift is that retention is a justice issue: the people most likely to leave are often the people most impacted by the communities being served, and losing them is a programmatic loss, not just a staffing one. |
|
|
|
Do you know an organization that could benefit from future-focused strategic planning, an event speaker or a facilitator? We invite you to introduce them to FutureGood.
As a thank you, FutureGood offers a referral fee of 5% of the total project value for introductions that result in a signed client contract. The program is open to friends of FutureGood. Making a referral is simple: introduce us and notify us when the connection is made. Our team will handle all follow-up conversations, proposal development, and project design.
Thank you for helping us bring future-focused thinking to more organizations and communities! |
|
|
|
|
DEI work is fracturing along geographic lines. States and localities are adopting sharply different policies, which means an approach that works in Minnesota may be legally restricted in Florida. |
|
What this could mean for the social sector: National DEI frameworks are losing their utility as operating guides. Organizations running multi-state programs will need to build regional infrastructure, including local legal counsel, community partners, and communications strategies tailored to each context. Smaller organizations with strong neighborhood or regional roots actually have a structural advantage here, because their work is already embedded in the specific relationships and trust that adaptation requires. |
|
|
Learn to spot trends relevant to your work |
|
If you want to learn more about futurism, including how to spot and make sense of these trends, you can! Sign up for our online learning program, FutureGood Studio, and empower yourself to be future-ready! |
|
|
|
|
Equity is moving from a program area into an organizational operating system. Budgeting, hiring, communications, and strategy will increasingly reflect equity principles, and DEI leaders are shifting from running standalone programs to shaping decisions across the whole organization. |
|
What this could mean for the social sector: Organizations that have kept equity work siloed in a single department or staff role are structurally unprepared for what this shift requires. When a budget decision, a hiring process, or a communications choice doesn't reflect equity principles, it signals to staff and communities that inclusion is aspirational rather than operational. Funders are watching this too, and those who fund for long-term effectiveness will increasingly look at whether equity is embedded in governance and decision-making, not just in program design. The organizations that make this transition well will have an advantage in trust, staff retention, and community credibility when the next disruption hits. |
|
|
|
|
AI is becoming a factor in hiring, funding decisions, and organizational communications across the social sector. Stanford HAI research found that most nonprofits and funders believe AI can strengthen mission-related work when used thoughtfully. At the same time, algorithmic bias is a real risk, and organizations will need governance structures to catch inequitable outcomes before they cause harm. OpenAI is on track to become the largest foundation in the US, which will shape how nonprofits access and use AI tools at scale. |
|
What this could mean for the social sector: Organizations that adopt AI without governance frameworks will embed bias into their most consequential decisions, including who gets hired, which communities get served, and how funding flows. The OpenAI foundation development is significant because it means one technology company will have more philanthropic influence than almost any other institution in the country, and nonprofits should be paying attention to how that shapes the tools and funding priorities available to them. Ethical AI governance is now a board-level responsibility, not just a technology question, and organizations that treat it as an IT decision will find themselves accountable for outcomes they didn't anticipate. The Stanford research is a useful reminder that the sector isn't resigned to harm, most leaders see real opportunity here, and the organizations that move thoughtfully now will be better positioned to shape how AI gets used rather than just responding to it. |
|
|
Got questions about the future? |
|
The future is moving fast. Join us for our next Futurism Q&A and get real answers from a trained futurist. Add it to your calendar now> |
